Major surgical groups disappointed in Medicare decision to drop facility accreditation requirement for bariatric surgery

Date: Sep-27-2013Despite strong opposition from leading surgical and medical groups, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has ruled it will no longer require Medicare patients to undergo bariatric surgical procedures at accredited facilities. CMS ruled that eligible Medicare patients may have bariatric operations performed at any center they choose, even those facilities with little experience in handling high-risk patients.

"We are disappointed and in strong disagreement with a ruling that appears to disregard overwhelming scientific evidence and medical opinion that bariatric accreditation programs save lives, improve patient outcomes, and enhance the quality of care," said Jaime Ponce, MD, President of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), the largest organization of surgeons who perform weight loss and metabolic operations.

"The standards required for accreditation provide important lifesaving safeguards for patients, particularly for Medicare beneficiaries, who have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality than the general bariatric surgery population," said David B. Hoyt, MD, FACS, American College of Surgeons (ACS) Executive Director. "We encourage Medicare patients to continue to select an accredited center for bariatric surgery. "

In addition to the ASMBS and ACS, other professional groups supporting accreditation and opposing the new CMS ruling are The Obesity Society, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, American Society of Bariatric Physicians (ASBP), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

About 750 inpatient and outpatient bariatric centers throughout the U.S. are accredited by either the ASMBS or ACS. Last year, the two surgical societies combined their respective programs and formed the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), to establish a national standard for accreditation and quality improvement that requires participating facilities to undergo a peer-evaluation process, follow data submission requirements, and demonstrate experience in managing bariatric surgical patients before, during, and after their procedures in order to receive accreditation.

"MBSAQIP will continue to build upon bariatric surgery's legacy of quality improvement, which has previously included a four-fold decline in mortality over the past decade, by initiating a new program in decreasing readmissions," said John Morton, MD, ASMBS Secretary-Treasurer and Associate Professor of Surgery at Stanford University.

The new ruling marks a reversal of a CMS policy enacted in 2006 that made facility accreditation a requirement for Medicare coverage. It also makes CMS the only major insurer that does not require bariatric surgical procedures be performed at an accredited center. Blue Cross Blue Shield, Aetna, Cigna and United Healthcare have each embraced and continue to support accreditation.

Back in July 2013, when CMS was still considering whether to continue or drop its accreditation requirement, the medical societies sent the agency a letter voicing their concern that "the proposal to remove the Bariatric Surgery Facility Certification will place the highly vulnerable Medicare population at risk" and "is based upon an incomplete review and analysis of the evidence."

The societies cited studies including one in the journal Surgical Endoscopy (July 2013), that found in-hospital mortality rates at non-accredited centers were more than three times higher than the mortality rate at accredited centers (0.22% vs. 0.06%). For the study, University of California Irvine researchers analyzed 277,760 bariatric procedures performed between 2006 and 2010. An earlier 2012 study published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons last year showed nearly identical differences in mortality between non-accredited and accredited academic bariatric centers (0.21% vs. 0.06%, respectively).

"We have made great strides in surgical techniques, patient care, and in identifying potential risks and managing complications," said Dr. Ponce. "But we cannot become complacent when it comes to patient safety and procedure effectiveness. We are committed to continuous quality improvement and accreditation is the mechanism by which we can best achieve it."
Courtesy: Medical News Today Note: Any medical information available in this news section is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional.