Gene therapy may block HIV without drugs
Date: Mar-06-2014In a small trial, researchers have successfully used gene therapy to boost the immune
system of 12 patients with HIV to resist infection. They removed the patients' white blood cells
to edit a gene in them, then infused them back into the patients. Some of the patients who
showed reduced viral loads were off HIV drugs completely.
In fact, one of the patients showed no detectable trace of HIV at all after therapy. The
researchers, who report their phase I study in the New England Journal of Medicine
believe theirs is the first published account of using gene editing in humans.
The team included researchers from the University of Pennsylvania (Penn), PA,
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, and Sangamo BioSciences, Richmond, CA, the company that
developed the gene editing technology.
Carl H. June, senior author of the study and professor at Penn's Perelman School of
Medicine, says:
"This study shows that we can safely and effectively engineer an HIV patient's own T cells to
mimic a naturally occurring resistance to the virus, infuse those engineered cells, have them
persist in the body, and potentially keep viral loads at bay without the use of drugs."
He says the findings reinforce their belief that editing T cells is the key to eliminating
the need for lifelong antiretroviral drugs (ADTs). It could even lead to "functional curative
approaches for HIV/AIDS," he adds. A functional cure means there are no detectable traces of the
disease in the patient.
The gene editing method they used is called "zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN)" - a sort of
molecular scissors.
They used ZFN to edit a gene called CCR5 in immune T cells to make it like a mutation that
occurs in 1% of the population. People with the mutation, called CCR5-delta-32, are naturally
resistant to HIV. The mutation effectively blocks the way the virus enters immune cells.
Each patient received an infusion of 10 billion modified cells
For the study, the team infused the patients' own modified T cells back into them. Each
received a single infusion, containing about 10 billion cells, between May 2009 and July
2012.
Starting 4 weeks after infusion, six of the patients were taken off antiretroviral therapy
altogether for up to 12 weeks, while the other six remained on treatment.
The purpose of a phase I trial is to test safety and how well patients tolerate the
treatment. The researchers report the infusions were safe and tolerable, and modified T cells
continued to persist in the patients during follow-up visits.
The trial also showed the technique shows promise in ability to suppress HIV. The viral loads
fell in four patients whose treatment was interrupted for 4 weeks.
One patient's HIV viral load fell below detectable levels
Also, in one of the patients, the viral load fell below the limit of detection - the
researchers could find no trace of HIV in the patient's body. They later discovered this patient
already had one natural copy of the CCR5 gene mutation.
Co-author Bruce L. Levine, a professor in cancer gene therapy, explains:
"Since half the subject's CCR5 genes were naturally disrupted, the gene editing approach was
building on the head start provided by inheriting the mutation from one parent. This case gives
us a better understanding of the mutation and the body's response to the therapy, opening up
another door for study."
The next step is to test the therapy with more patients using larger numbers of modified T
cells and improved ways of helping more cells persist in the body to achieve as near to a
functional cure as possible.
The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the Penn Center for AIDS
Research, Clinical Trials Unit, and Sangamo BioSciences funded and supported the study.
Written by Catharine Paddock PhD
View all articles written by Catharine, or follow Catharine on:
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without the permission of Medical News Today.
Courtesy: Medical News Today
Note: Any medical information available in this news section is not intended as a substitute for informed medical
advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional.