Ebola's ability to survive in the environment poorly understood
Date: Dec-11-2014 The means by which Ebola virus transmits through direct contact with body fluids of
infected individuals is well covered in scientific literature. But little is known about
the life the virus has - if any - outside the body. For example, does Ebola remain active on
glass surfaces and countertops? Does it persist in sewage and wastewater systems?
A team of engineers says scientific literature contains little information about how well Ebola survives outside the body. They call for research to investigate its persistence in the environment so correct guidance can be given on disinfection and waste handling.
Such questions are rarely addressed in currently published literature, say engineers from the
University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and Drexel University, Philadelphia.
They report their
findings - or lack of them - and why it is important to find some answers, in a paper
published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters.
The current Ebola epidemic in West Africa, cases for which were first notified to the
World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2014, is the largest and most complex outbreak since
the virus was first discovered in 1976. So far, there have been more than 11,000 lab-confirmed cases and over 6,300 deaths.
The size and scale of the epidemic have raised significant unanswered questions for the
scientific and engineering communities, as well as the general public - questions about
"Ebola virus persistence in the environment and the potential for an environmental route of
Ebola virus exposure," note the authors.
Ebola disinfection practices are not consistent
Knowing how long Ebola virus can live outside the body - on surfaces, in water or in
liquid droplets - is important for setting out disinfection guidelines and practices to
prevent spread of the disease, the team explains.
Currently, there are inconsistencies in Ebola disinfection practices, depending on the
setting.
For example, the current WHO guidelines say it is safe for hospitals and clinics to flush
liquid waste from Ebola patients down the toilet or dispose of them in a latrine. But in research labs, the liquid waste from Ebola patients must be disinfected before it
can enter the sewage system, note the authors.
To try and resolve some of these contradictions, the authors searched the scientific
literature to find out how long Ebola can survive in the environment. But despite an extensive search, they could not find any evidence to back up the WHO assertions.
Lead author Kyle Bibby, assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at
Pitt's Swanson School of Engineering, says:
"The World Health Organization has been saying you can put (human waste) in pit latrines
or ordinary sanitary sewers and that the virus then dies. They may be right, but the evidence
isn't there."
It would be 'imprudent to dismiss potential for environmental transmission'
In their paper, the authors note there are suggestions that Ebola virus is inactivated at
"a rate more rapid than or comparable to those of typically monitored enteric viruses."
However, nobody has published studies that show whether Ebola virus can cause infection
from a contaminated surface or that measure how long it remains active in sewage, water,
wastewater or sludge.
The authors argue that while the prevailing thinking is that the environment is not the
main exposure route for Ebola virus disease, it would be "imprudent to dismiss the potential
of environmental transmission without further evidence."
They conclude that Ebola's persistence outside the body needs more careful investigation,
through environmental persistence studies and microbial risk assessments. Only then can we
"properly inform the safe handling and disposal of Ebola virus-contaminated waste," they
note.
To this end, Prof. Bibby has secured a $110,000 grant from the National Science Foundation
to identify surrogate viruses that are similar to Ebola and study their survival rates in
water and wastewater.
Meanwhile, Medical News Today recently learned that experts believe Ebola survivors should be enlisted to help manage the current
epidemic in West Africa. One reason they give is that the blood of Ebola survivors may have
protective properties and donating some of it could increase the chances of survival of
others infected with the virus.
Written by Catharine Paddock PhD
Not to be reproduced without permission.
Follow @twitter
window.twttr = (function (d, s, id) {
var t, js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src= "https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
return window.twttr || (t = { _e: [], ready: function (f) { t._e.push(f) }
}(document, "script", "twitter-wjs"));
Courtesy: Medical News Today
Note: Any medical information available in this news section is not intended as a substitute for informed medical
advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional.